[ad_1]
Components 1 must be extra clear about what’s and isn’t a suitable stage of defensive driving within the wake of Fernando Alonso’s penalty on the Australian Grand Prix, in accordance with Guenther Steiner.
Alonso was given a retrospective drive-through penalty — transformed into 20 seconds of race time — for driving in a “probably harmful” method when slowing forward of George Russell on the method to Flip 6 late in Sunday’s race. The choice has sparked debate on what counts as skillful protection and when it crosses a line, however talking after being introduced as a brand new Miami Grand Prix ambassador, former Haas group principal Steiner says readability is a very powerful final result.
“I haven’t seen the info, I simply learn what you’ve all learn, that he was on the brakes and tapping the brakes and issues like this,” Steiner stated. “I feel we’re on the level now the place, we had it with Kevin [Magnussen] the place he was defending in Saudi Arabia, now Fernando defending the place…
“I really was with Checo [Perez] on the airplane again from Melbourne and we had a fast chat about it, and we got here to the conclusion that preventing this difficult for P6 is a little bit bit overdoing it. I imply, I do know that everyone wants the factors, but it surely’s like, ‘Wow.’ I feel we’re on the restrict.
“But additionally, the stewards’s verdict — you’re flawed however you’re proper — it wasn’t very clear to me. ‘You get the penalty however we don’t know in case you ought to get the penalty.’ It’s like, ‘I provide the penalty however I’m unsure in case you’ve accomplished flawed.’ So I feel it must be a clearer stance, and it must be the identical for everybody as nicely.
“I feel we had been on the restrict there — if not over the restrict.”
Aston Martin has opted in opposition to interesting the penalty given to Alonso — regardless of it costing the group two factors general — citing an absence of recent proof that may permit it to request a proper of evaluate.
[ad_2]
Source link
